What common defense might a driver use against a speeding violation recorded by an SMD?

What common defense might a driver use against a speeding violation recorded by an SMD?

• A. Challenging the driver's age
• B. Claiming insufficient signage for speed limits
• C. Arguing about the weather during the incident
• D. Proving their speed limit education

Answer: (B)

Claiming insufficient signage for speed limits is a common defense a driver might use against a speeding violation recorded by a Speed Measurement Device (SMD). This defense rests on the premise that drivers are not adequately informed about the speed limits in the area where they were ticketed. If a driver can demonstrate that speed limit signs were either missing, obscured, or not clearly visible, they may argue that they were unaware of the speed limit and consequently should not be held liable for the speeding violation.

This defense is significant because it addresses the fundamental principle that a driver must have a reasonable opportunity to be aware of posted speed limits. If the court finds that the signage is inadequate, it can lead to a dismissal of the speeding charge. In contrast, the other options do not effectively challenge the validity of the speeding violation in the same way; they either lack direct relevance to speed limit awareness or are more subjective and not typically recognized as valid defenses in traffic court.